Personal Injury Trial Lawyers
Serving Injured And Wronged Clients Throughout California
Successfully Prosecuting Difficult Fire Cases
At Daniels Law, our attorneys will be here for you when you are facing the life-shattering results of fire. In California, there are many reasons for catastrophic fire-related injuries and property damage. Human error, corporate negligence or lightning, to name a few. We have the experience to help you explore your legal options to get the compensation you need to recover.
We can help you with every stage of your claim in and out of the courtroom, including documenting your loss, finding resources for debris removal, hiring a contractor, dealing with insurance representatives and more.
Case Results: Verdicts And Settlements For Our Clients
Doe v. Luster | $20.526 Million Verdict
Personal injury. The defendant drugged and raped his live-in girlfriend and videotaped the crimes. An action was filed and went to trial in Ventura County, California.
Cruz v. Anglada | $1,449,293.95 Verdict
Personal Injury. The plaintiffs were injured when large riot broke out in front of a soccer stadium. An action was filed and went to trial in Los Angeles, California.
Cobb v. County of Los Angeles | $11 Million Verdict
Personal injury. James Cobb was seriously injured when a Los Angeles County forklift ran him over in a crosswalk. The County denied liability, the jury made a just award that was upheld on appeal.
Tran v. TNT USA, Inc. | $4.5 Million Verdict
Three brothers lost their mother when a delivery truck ran her down in a crosswalk. We tried the case.
Fry v. DCH Toyota | $2.2 Million Verdict
Personal injury after an automobile dealership performed a defective repair on our client’s Toyota 4Runner.
Zevada v. Sasson | $3.5 Million Arbitration Award
Enforcing fair and honest dealings. We represented a family-owned supermarket chain that mistakenly signed a lease with a gross percentage rental clause that effectively stripped the profits from the business. The court ruled that the term was a mistake and awarded significant damages.
Mary Doe vs. Pharmaceutical Company | $6 Million Settlement
Drug safety. A young woman suffered severe physical injury including primary pulmonary hypertension after ingesting a defective drug.
Alvarado v. City of Anaheim | $2.5 Million Settlement
Workplace safety. A construction worker suffered brain injury following a fall at a construction site.
Gonzalez v. Dewalt Brown and Pasa Alta Manor, Inc. | $2 Million Settlement
Disability safety. In this cutting-edge case against a residential care facility, failure to provide promised medical services to a mentally challenged woman resulted in the birth of a tragically disabled child. Despite a vigorous defense based on constitutional law, the matter settled on the eve of trial for the total available insurance.
Doe, Driver v. Doe Car Rental Company | $1.3 Million Settlement
Automotive product safety. A 15-passenger van overturned on a Nevada highway causing the death of a 60-year-old woman. A product liability claim was filed which claimed the accident was caused by handling and stability design defects. Despite the defendant’s claims that the accident was caused by the driver falling asleep, the product case settled shortly before trial.
Anderson v. Village Covenant Church | $980,000 Settlement
Child safety. School safety. Pediatric brain injury.
What Clients Are Saying
“The Daniels Law team members are professionals through and through. Bill Daniels is a master of his craft. He is a skilled listener, extremely savvy and perceptive, and a creative, strategic thinker and negotiator.”
– SG, Santa Barbara, CA
“I cannot recommend Mr. Bill Daniels highly enough! I was going through a difficult period in my life and had spoken to a few lawyers, many were not even willing to hear my case. I contacted Bill and hearing about him from a mutual friend and could not be happier.”
– Fred A., Los Angeles, CA
“I am a retired Chinese language teacher and I give Mr. Daniels an “A+.” Mr. Daniels is a very polite, kind and reasonable attorney. He answered all my questions and returned my phone calls and remembered who I was.”
– Kitty T., El Monte, CA
“Basically I’m 100% satisfied with the outcome of my case. They were inviting to any questions I had, they encouraged me to ask questions, they always gave me a prompt and accurate response. They returned all my phone calls.”
– Damian W., Los Angeles, CA
“Being a plaintiff against a major corporate defendant that has unlimited funds to defend the case is intimidating. Especially when the contract says the loser pays! Bill Daniels was exceptional in understanding the issues and aggressively putting forth my case.”
– James B., Irvine, CA